Dst Is Bad For Everyone s Health - 981 Words

The most convincing premise is P2. This sub-argument seems to be intended as deductive because the author suggests that this premise is conclusively supported by using forceful language to state that DST is certainly bad for everyone’s health, as opposed to possibly being harmful. In this case, the argument is invalid. It can be true that DST causes adverse health effects but for some people to not suffer from these. Therefore, the conclusion that DST is bad for all people’s health is false despite the premises being true. However, if the argument is to be taken as non-deductive it becomes more convincing. The article gives probable evidence that DST is bad for people’s health because it puts people at risk of suffering these negative effects. Therefore, the argument is strong because the conclusion is probable. Furthermore, there is no reason to disbelieve the research that provided this information, including the sub sub-argument: early morning sunlight is impo rtant for those affected by SAD, DST short-changes these early morning hours which is why DST negatively affects people with SAD. Therefore, assuming the background research is true, this argument is cogent. While there may be counter-arguments involving people whose health is not affected, this argument is convincing because it is probable that something which is linked to damaging people’s health is bad for people’s health. To evaluate the least effective argument, let’s consider P6. Again, this argument isShow MoreRelatedWhole Foods International Expansion Essay5105 Words   |  21 Pagesfees, totaling an 8.2 million dollar investment for the first German Whole Foods to enter Munich. 3. Funding Whole Foods as the parent company of the wholly owned subsidy has excellent financials in comparison to industry norms. See below for 2011’s growth trends according to Hoover’s. | Whole Foods | Kroger | Safeway | Trader Joes | Industry Median | Market Median1 | 12-Month Revenue Growth | 12.24% | 9.96% | 6.29% | -- | (29.07%) | (1.31%) | 12-Month Net Income Growthh | 39.37% | (46Read MoreModern English Macbeth21221 Words   |  85 Pages64 Modern English Macbeth translation  © 2005 NoSweatShakespeare. All rights reserved 2 About The Author Warren King has been teaching English literature for thirty-five years in English comprehensive and public schools. During the 1980 s he was seconded to the national Shakespeare and Schools project to help develop methods of teaching Shakespeare in the classroom to bring the plays to life for pupils of all ages. After the project ended he continued that work as an adviser in toRead MoreInvestment and Economic Moats46074 Words   |  185 Pagesthe underlying business, but you’ll have to balance the outsize returns in the stocks that bounce back with the losses in those that fade from existence. cintro.indd 1 1/26/08 3:14:59 AM [2] T H E L I T T L E B O O K T H AT B U I L D S W E A LT H Or you can simply buy wonderful companies at reasonable prices, and let those companies compound cash over long periods of time. Surprisingly, there aren’t all that many money managers who follow this strategy, even though it’s the oneRead MoreCissp Study Guide67657 Words   |  271 Pagesvalidity. Ownership is the correct answer in this statement. However, here is a reference. Fundamentally important to any security program s success us the senior management s high-level statement of commitment to the information security policy process and a senior management s understanding of how important security controls and protections are to the enterprise s continuity. Senior management must be Pass Any Exam. Any Time. - www..com 4 Ac tua lTe sts Explanation: Information securityRead MoreI Love Reading Essay69689 Words   |  279 PagesGovernment of India b i n n o v a i c u l t u r w u s i n e s f E N T R E P R E N E UR S H I P m n a d c a t i o n u o n P l o y m e n t l t h e v i r o n m e n t n a n c e A Study by National Knowledge Commission Entrepreneurship in India National Knowledge Commission 2008  ©National Knowledge Commission, 2008 This report has been prepared by Amlanjyoti Goswami, Namita Dalmia and Megha Pradhan with support and guidance from Dr. Ashok Kolaskar and Mr. Sunil Bahri. Table